Healthcare clinics often overlook the inequities between women’s and men’s lives, including power, decision-making capacity, and access to resources, as well as varying communication patterns. These inequities limit women’s ability to access and use reproductive health services.
In 2001–2003, 17 of the PROCOSI member organizations implemented a program to incorporate a gender perspective into existing reproductive health programs and to assess the costs and effects of doing so.
with a gender analysis, which you will learn more about in the last session of this course.
PROCOSI used a framework adapted from an International Planned Parenthood (IPPF) tool, to evaluate quality of care from a gender perspective in:
-
- Institutional policies and practices
- Practices of providers
- Client satisfaction
- Client comfort
- Use of gendered language
- Information, communication and training
- Monitoring and evaluation
- Procosi Project Summary
Each organization designed and implemented its own activities to address gender in quality of care. Each team's action plans were different, but some examples of activities included:
-
- hiring doctors of both genders for each specialty so clients could select the provider they felt most comfortable with;
- developing algorithms to review clients' needs and offer appropriate services;
- and even moving visiting rooms and offices to improve client flow.
Support was provided in the form of a packet of print materials and videos related to gender and reproductive health for distribution to clients and providers.
PROCOSI‘s Project Coordinator visited the participating units twice to follow up on their progress, answer questions on the methodology, suggest activities to improve indicators, collect data, and gather information on costs.
This intervention was evaluated using a mixed-method, pretest-posttest design. The evaluation showed that the intervention resulted in significant improvements in reproductive health outcomes, including reductions in unmet need for family planning and more positive interactions between women and health providers. It also improved gender equality outcomes, such as improved attitudes among women and men toward shared decision-making, couples’ communication, and gender-based violence.
These materials were adapted from the Global Health eLearning Center, U.S. Agency for International Development.